Thursday, August 31, 2006

We Will Not be Silent

I read this on another Blog... it speaks for itself.

___________________________

"I went to JFK in the morning to catch my Jet Blue plane to California. I reached Terminal 6 at around 7:15 am, was issued a boarding pass, and checked all my bags in, and then walked to the security checkpoint. For the first time in my life, I was taken to a secondary search . My shoes were searched, and I was asked for my boarding pass and ID.

After passing the security, I walked to check where gate 16 was, then I went to get something to eat. I got some cheese and grapes with some orange juice and I went back to Gate 16 and sat down in the boarding area enjoying my breakfast and some sunshine.At around 8:30, two men approached me while I was checking my phone. One of them asked me if I had a minute and he showed me his badge, I said: "sure".

We walked some few steps and stood in front of the boarding counter where I found out that they were accompanied by another person, a woman from Jet Blue. One of the two men who approached me first, Inspector Harris, asked for my id card and boarding pass. I gave him my boarding pass and driver's license. He said "people are feeling offended because of your t-shirt". I looked at my t-shirt: I was wearing my shirt which states in both Arabic and English "we will not be silent". You can take a look at it in this picture taken during our Jordan meetings with Iraqi MPs.



I said "I am very sorry if I offended anyone, I didnt know that this t-shirt will be offensive". He asked me if I had any other T-shirts to put on, and I told him that I had checked in all of my bags and I asked him "why do you want me to take off my t-shirt? Isn't it my constitutional right to express myself in this way?" The second man in a greenish suit interfered and said "people here in the US don't understand these things about constitutional rights". So I answered him "I live in the US, and I understand it is my right to wear this t-shirt".

Then I once again asked the three of them : "How come you are asking me to change my t-shirt? Isn't this my constitutional right to wear it? I am ready to change it if you tell me why I should. Do you have an order against Arabic t-shirts? Is there such a law against Arabic script?" so inspector Harris answered "you can't wear a t-shirt with Arabic script and come to an airport. It is like wearing a t-shirt that reads "I am a robber" and going to a bank". I said "but the message on my t-shirt is not offensive, it just says "we will not be silent". I got this t-shirt from Washington DC. There are more than a 1000 t-shirts printed with the same slogan. You can google them or email them at wewillnotbesilent@gmail.com . It is printed in many other languages: Arabic, Farsi, Spanish, English, etc." Inspector Harris said: "We cant make sure that your t-shirt means we will not be silent, we don't have a translator. Maybe it means something else". I said: "But as you can see, the statement is in both Arabic and English". He said "maybe it is not the same message".

So based on the fact that Jet Blue doesn't have a translator, anything in Arabic is suspicious because maybe it'll mean something bad!Meanwhile, a third man walked in our direction. He stood with us without introducing himself, and he looked at inspector Harris's notes and asks him: "is that his information?", inspector Harris answered "yes". The third man, Mr. Harmon, asks inspector Harris : "can I copy this information?", and inspector Harris says "yes, sure". Inspector Harris said: "You don't have to take of your t-shirt, just put it on inside-out". I refused to put on my shirt inside-out.

So the woman interfered and said "let's reach a compromise. I will buy you a new t-shirt and you can put it on on top of this one". I said "I want to keep this t-shirt on". Both inspector Harris and Mr. Harmon said "No, we can't let you get on that airplane with your t-shirt". I said "I am ready to put on another t-shirt if you tell me what is the law that requires such a thing. I want to talk to your supervisor". Inspector Harris said "You don't have to talk to anyone. Many people called and complained about your t-shirt. Jetblue customers were calling before you reached the checkpoint, and costumers called when you were waiting here in the boarding area". It was then that I realized that my t-shirt was the reason why I had been taken to the secondary checking. I asked the four people again to let me talk to any supervisor, and they refused.The Jet Blue woman was asking me again to end this problem by just putting on a new t-shirt, and I felt threatened by Mr. Harmon's remarks as in "Let's end this the nice way".

Taking in consideration what happens to other Arabs and Muslims in US airports, and realizing that I will miss my flight unless I covered the Arabic script on my t-shirt as I was told by the four agents, I asked the Jet Blue woman to buy me a t-shirt and I said "I don't want to miss my flight." She asked, what kind of t-shirts do you like. Should I get you an "I heart new york t-shirt?". So Mr. Harmon said "No, we shouldn't ask him to go from one extreme to another". I asked Mr. Harmon why does he assume I hate New York if I had some Arabic script on my t-shirt, but he didn't answer. The woman went away for 3 minutes, and she came back with a gray t-shirt reading "new york". I put the t-shirt on and removed the price tag. I told the four people who were involved in the conversation: "I feel very sad that my personal freedom was taken away like this. I grew up under authoritarian governments in the Middle East, and one of the reasons I chose to move to the US was that I don't want an officer to make me change my t-shirt. I will pursue this incident today through a Constitutional rights organization, and I am sure we will meet soon". Everyone said okay and left, and I went back to my seat.

At 8:50 I was called again by a fourth young man, standing with the same jetblue woman. He asked for my boarding pass, so I gave it to him, and stood in front of the boarding counter. I asked the woman: "is everything okay?", she responded: "Yes, sure. We just have to change your seat". I said: "but I want this seat, that's why I chose it online 4 weeks ago", the fourth man said " there is a lady with a toddler sitting there. We need the seat." Then they re-issued me a small boarding pass for seat 24a, instead of seat 3a. They said that I can go to the airplane now. I was the first person who entered the airplane, and I was really annoyed about being assigned this seat in the back of the airplane too. It smelled like the bathrooms, which is why I had originally chosen a seat which would be far from that area.

It sucks to be an Arab/Muslim living in the US these days. When you go to the middle east, you are a US tax-payer destroying people's houses with your money, and when you come back to the US, you are a suspected terrorist and plane hijacker."

If you want to call Jet Blue and ask about their regulations against Arabic script, you can use the following numbers:
* If calling within the U.S., Bahamas or Puerto Rico: 1-800-JETBLUE (538-2583)
* If calling from the Dominican Republic: 1-200-9898
* If calling from outside the U.S. or Dominican Republic: 001-801-365-2525
* Customers who are deaf or hard of hearing (TTY/TDD): 1-800-336-553

Raed's Blog

4 Comments:

Blogger Eitan Ha'ahzari said...

Andrew: you seem to pay so much attention to abuses against minorities while it also seems like you don't care at all about the rights of majorities. In America, for example, blacks were persecuted for centuries. These days, it's the whites that are persecuted because it's "in" to be black, becuase blacks dominate almost all major sports, because blacks send their kids to the best univsities thanks to affirmitive action and because blacks who don't feel like working get a free-pass on life. I don't know about you but it seems ridiculous to me. I have a few black friends back in Chicago, and my beloved chess coach was black so I have no problem with them. It's the government that has given African-Americans special priviledges that I have a problem with.

I'm using this example so as offend as few people as possible.

8:31 pm, September 12, 2006  
Blogger Andrew said...

Friere can probably explain this better than me, so check out a guy called Paulo Friere and any of his articles on 'cycles of opression'.

Majority rights are a misnomer, as 'majorities' are and always have been built on the opression/suppression of minorities. Therefore, the simple existence of a 'majority' denotes opression and a distinct lack of rights for any number of peoples.

In situations like this there is also more then a touch of irony and a reversal of apparently 'universal' concepts of rights and freedoms. The majority will always use its own best interests and protection of its rights to justify supressing a minortiy even further, denying that minority access to rights which the majority declares to be 'common property'. The ironic part is that these freedoms (in the context of western societies, or anthrocentric societies in general) can only EVER be realised through the supression of others.

The argument over 'special-privilleges' is also a moot one, and somewhat cruel too I think.

African-Americans were (and to a certain extent are now) in a similar situation to Aboriginal people in Australia. But to stick with America. Black people were slaves for many, many years. They had NO rights, no access to money, no access to laws of any kind, no freedom to live and move as they pleased.

Come the end of slavery Blacks were still brutally oppressed (it's well documented enough that I won't do history the dis-service of bungling it with my poor knowledge on the subject; others can demonstrate this much better than I) and occupied the ABSOLUTE LOWEST sections of society, still with very few rights and little in the way of freedom.

Come the civil rights movement and all of a sudden African-Americans have equal access to the law, alot of human rights etc etc (Non-Black americans began to see them as being people) and all of a sudden they were expected to act and perform in society exactly the same as White Americans.

Coming from a background of abject poverty, extremely poor education, almost no health care, degrading housing and judicial abuses is it any wonder there are still social problems in Black communities? And thus these communities require special funding, programs etc to address centuries of mis-treatment and the ingrained social problems this has caused.

Furthermore, you need to realise that the idea of 'all men are equal' is extremely demeaning and opressive in and of itself. People ARE different, and DIFFERENT people have DIFFERENT needs. Hence African-Americans getting education scholarships is a specific need of this community, and it would be ridiculous to try and meet the needs of the Black community with programs equivalent to the needs of white communities, or hispanic communites etc. The same applies the other way too, as giving education scholarships to affluent middle class white communities is completely absurd.

Difference of person and needs must be recognised and embraced. It is a fallacy in the west that difference equals conflict or tension; on the contrary difference most often is reinforcing, complimentary and strengthening to all systems be they social, ecological etc.

9:56 pm, September 12, 2006  
Blogger Andrew said...

P.S. I fail to see how wearing a T-shirt with the words 'We Will Not Be Silent' threatens any rights either.

9:59 pm, September 12, 2006  
Blogger Eitan Ha'ahzari said...

Andrew: I must say, I agree with you concerning the Muslim woman in question who was unjustly treated by the airline. But just as I focus all my attention on terrorists killing civilians(and I know I must change that in order to be fair) you focus all of your attention on minorities being mistreated.

Also, your hypothesis that "Majority rights are a misnomer, as 'majorities' are and always have been built on the opression/suppression of minorities." is a false one, in my opinion. Look at the example of apartheid South Africa. The white minority oppressed the black majority for how many centuries?

But back to the U.S. and the example of African-Americans and whites. I, too, think that blacks in America are in need of socio-economic help and that it will take many years before they're able to recover from the horrible injustices that were done to them since the advent of slavery. But there are other ways of compensating them. If you continue to give money to those who are completely cabable of but simply don't want to earn money for a living, you're only making the problem worse. There are other ways of fighting poverty just like there are other ways, besides affirmitive action of having more black students attend better universities.

3:16 am, September 13, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home